In The Bluest Eye,
Toni Morrison brings up how women tend to “worry about the edges of [one’s]
hair, and how they spend countless hours every year straightening their hair in
order to conform to beauty standards. Characters in the novel, such as Pauline,
are looked down upon when they don’t straighten their hair to make it resemble Caucasian
hair. During our discussion in class, I found this topic incredibly un-relatable.
I have stick straight hair—you could say it’s an Asian thing. Ever since I can
remember, I’ve always wanted anything but stick straight hair. I dug out my
mother’s archaic curling iron the day I learned of such a tool, and even got a
perm in seventh grade. So you can imagine my surprise when I started hearing
about and seeing girls show up to school with their hair looking very similar
to mine, but obviously straightened. I didn’t understand why girls would put
effort and sacrifice precious sleep in order to make their hair blander and
less individualistic. Now that I better understand the desire to conform to
society and the danger of individuality, I understand why girls and women worry
about the edges of their hair. But then…why do women curl their hair? It’s
alright boys, I don’t understand women either.
Sunday, November 2, 2014
Sunday, October 26, 2014
Donut Blame Barbie
During the years when my age still fell in the single digits, I lived by one rule and one rule alone--never, ever utter the horrendous three Ps--pretty, pink, and princess. I grew up playing with my brother's toys: legos, bionicles, pokemon, and beyblades. I would ride my hotwheels tricycle around the neighborhood, awaiting the day that I could graduate from such childish whims and inherit the big kid transformers themed bicycle and its matching training wheels. A family friend once blessed me with the ever-so-popular Barbie, but my mother quickly learned from her mistake and stuck with giving me my brother's old toys after I continuously stripped Barbie and left her stark naked on the kitchen floor.
Today, tons of sources are attacking the Barbie company for forcing an unattainable goal for body image among young girls. They say that Barbie is the reason that girls are self-conscious, have eating disorders, and are bullied.
However, what about the millions of girls around the word that grew up like me? Never did I ever set foot in that "atrociously" pink isle at my local Toys R Us voluntarily, so, according to the logic of these people who blame the societal flaw of body image on a children's toy, I should have no problem with what I should look like. Wrong.
I do not attain to be Barbie. I do not long for her life, her body, or her lifestyle, but that does not prevent me or any other human being from idealizing what one's body should look like. It's easy for people to put all the blame on one source, especially on sources focused around children and teenagers, simply because our minds are more malleable and easier to manipulate. "Serial killers exist because all the video games are about fighting", or "Girls are prioritizing outer beauty over inner beauty because chick flicks and dolls taught them so" are constantly headers of articles all over the internet. What many don't understand is that correlation does not imply causation (yay stats)--removing Barbie from a child's equation may reduce the rate at which young girls feel the desire to be tall, skinny, and alluring, but it will not eradicate the objectification of women or the desire to meet beauty standards.
Today, tons of sources are attacking the Barbie company for forcing an unattainable goal for body image among young girls. They say that Barbie is the reason that girls are self-conscious, have eating disorders, and are bullied.
However, what about the millions of girls around the word that grew up like me? Never did I ever set foot in that "atrociously" pink isle at my local Toys R Us voluntarily, so, according to the logic of these people who blame the societal flaw of body image on a children's toy, I should have no problem with what I should look like. Wrong.
I do not attain to be Barbie. I do not long for her life, her body, or her lifestyle, but that does not prevent me or any other human being from idealizing what one's body should look like. It's easy for people to put all the blame on one source, especially on sources focused around children and teenagers, simply because our minds are more malleable and easier to manipulate. "Serial killers exist because all the video games are about fighting", or "Girls are prioritizing outer beauty over inner beauty because chick flicks and dolls taught them so" are constantly headers of articles all over the internet. What many don't understand is that correlation does not imply causation (yay stats)--removing Barbie from a child's equation may reduce the rate at which young girls feel the desire to be tall, skinny, and alluring, but it will not eradicate the objectification of women or the desire to meet beauty standards.
Sunday, October 19, 2014
Hypocrisy: Donut Deny
I've always understood that being
a hypocrite is a natural thing: it's easy for anybody to watch Honey Boo Boo
and say "Wow, they should get off their couch and start doing some stuff
that could positively impact the world" when the viewer himself/herself is
sitting on the couch watching reality TV. However, the three articles we
studied in class this week showed me that our nation and its values are planted
in hypocrisy.
Every Fourth of July, everyone celebrates the work of our
founding fathers, including our buddy Thomas Jefferson, for granting us
independence. However, the freedom they asked for is not the same as the
freedom I have today as an Asian-American. I don’t like the term
Asian-American, because my nationality is just American, but for the purpose of
my argument, and also in the eyes of our founding fathers, I am Asian-American.
Decades after the US became an independent country, our “leaders” still
continued to oppress the people of their country. If I had been alive during the
time of the Revolution, the nation’s independence would not have granted me
freedom, but instead a change in my oppressors. The Declaration is a list of
grievances against the King, which, if reworded, could be used against the
creators of the document. So, that’s exactly what the feminist movement did. Their
document cried of oppression of every kind; their accusations against men seemed
endless. Stanton was not mistaken—it is true that the women of the nation at
that time were significantly inferior to the men. However, in 1848, when the
Declaration of Sentiments was signed, many women were still unafraid to treat
their slaves the same way that the men treat them.
All in all, even though centuries have passed and the
movement for women’s rights is still ongoing and racism is still prominent in
people’s everyday lives, I sure am glad to be alive now instead of back then.
Sunday, October 12, 2014
I Donut Know Where to Start
Let me just put it out there that reading the end of The Scarlet Letter was infuriating. If
there is any literary term for the antonym of Verisimilitude, please let me
know, for as of right now, I’m just going to make up my own word for
it—TheEndofTheScarletLetter. I could rant for pages, but I’ll just touch up on
the basics.
The tragic hero, Dimmesdale, was thoroughly disappointing.
Even when he was ignorant and overly pious in the beginning of the novel, at
least he had his own backbone. In the scene at the woods, he dared to say “I
pray you, if thou hast any means of pacifying the
child, do it forthwith! … Pacify her, if thou lovest me!” Words cannot
describe how disturbed I was by this dialogue. By taking in Dimmesdale, Hester
is basically taking in another child. Does he really think that she’s choosing to
have Pearl be this wild rampant of a child (can you tell I dislike Pearl also)?
In the end, when Dimmesdale repents his sin to the
community, he decides to just drop dead and leave his family behind. Sure, I
understand that his death did have symbolism and that it created dramatic
effect and character development, but just because it is the seventeenth
century does not allow one to defy the laws of universe and drop dead whenever
he pleases! If anything, I thought that revealing his sin would make him
stronger in the way that it did for Hester. Dimmesdale is supposedly the tragic
hero, but to me, he is the most tragic tragic hero I have ever read about.
I feel as if I’m always super angry after reading an
archaic classic; what they used to find beautiful and romantic (i.e. Romeo and
Juliet), I just find humorous. It’s a good thing that Hester is a strong,
independent woman who don’t need no man.
A symbolism of Pearl in the modern day society |
Sunday, October 5, 2014
I'm Running Out of Donut Related Title Ideas
Before we began The Scarlet Letter unit,
scarlet, to me, was just a pretentious way of saying red. I spent a good few
minutes trying to search "The Scarlett Letter" on google, but instead
just continuously ending up with Scarlett Johansson all over my search
results.
Since then, I've heard the class
discuss many connotations of the colors red and scarlet. In class, red was
always seen as the color of the devil—dark and evil. We
always assume that any red is the color of sin, which is why Hester has to wear
her symbol in scarlet, and why she dresses pearl in all red to remind her of her
sins. Even Wikipedia, the most valid source of all time, mentions how “scarlet
is often associated with immortality and sin, particularly prostitution or sin.”
Yet, I’ve grown up knowing red as a
color of celebration and happiness. In the Chinese Culture, red is commonly
seen during Chinese New Year and weddings. Whereas brides in the western world
wear white, Chinese brides are clad in vibrant red. White is worn to funerals
instead. It’s difficult to categorize colors with a specific connotation when
they could have completely different meanings to different people with
different backgrounds and cultures. Besides, how can
you assume red is all bad when you've got these?
Saturday, September 27, 2014
Donut Identify Me With My Weird Blog Theme
I have always heard that high school is a good time to find
your identity. However, similarly to Hester's situation, a high schooler does not simply find his or her own identity, but is instead branded with one. I’ve noticed that many
times, people are known more by an activity that they participate in or an event
that impacted their life than their name. Unfortunately, I am a hypocrite in
this case.
I don’t go to football games.
Maybe it’s because I’m scared of that mono-infested donkey head or whatever
animal it is, or maybe because I can’t see over anyone’s head in the student
section of the bleachers. I am possibly the most ignorant student in all of
Troy High when it comes to football; I can only faintly tell you how it works
and what its objective is. In a school of 1.4 thousand people, it is easy for
me to be completely unfamiliar with Troy High’s football and the people
involved in it, while still maintaining a (pitiful) social life. Someone could give
me name of a football player, and I’d just blink and stare back. However, if he
or she said “Number 99? Neon-pink-spandex-shorts-for-spirit-week dude?” I’d automatically
be able to envision the face of the person—forever pink spandex football dude
number 99 instead of his name, Austin Mahoney. There is so much more to Mr.
Mahoney that I will never know about, but he will never be able to escape the
identity that I hypothetically branded him with.
Maybe Mr. Mahoney will one
day go to college in Austria and create a new path for himself, but he must not
forget that high school is just a microcosm of the “real world”. Unless he
beats society to its own game, the cycle will repeat, and Mr. Mahoney will be
branded once again.
You do you, Austin Mahoney.
Sunday, September 21, 2014
“Donut Stereotype: They’re All Demeaning and Offensive”
As the daughter of two Asian
immigrant parents, I am no stranger to stereotypes. I've probably heard them
all--short, bad driver, smarter than average. For years, I've told myself that
I would defy these stereotypes—maybe not the short part, but “I will be a
wonderful driver, thank you very much.” However, the more that I think about
it, the more that I realize that I am not ashamed to fall into every single Asian
stereotype.
(I don't know martial arts, but I wish I did).
Stereotypes were not created out of thin air—they are stereotypes
because they are common. Do all Canadians have a fiery passion for hockey? No, but a lot of them do. Are all Caucasian
girls clad in a long Northface parka and Uggs in the winter time? No, but a lot of them are. We create our
own stereotypes—people did not originally jump to conclusions about a certain
group of people to shame them, but instead to speak what they know and what
they have observed. I’m not saying that it is acceptable to stereotype.
However, I am saying that it is inevitable. Everybody does, and everybody will,
the difference in it being conscious or subconscious. How the certain groups of
people react to the stereotypes are what causes the dramatics. It is not
uncommon to see these kinds of posts that joke about the actions of the “basic
white girl”. Conversely, if an article was posted about the actions of the “basic
black girl”, the “basic Indian girl”, etc., the internet would explode. One article
is classified as a list of humorous stereotypes, but the others are classified as
just flat-out racist. If a filmmaker portrays a new Asian immigrant with broken
English and a bowl of rice for lunch, it is considered an offensive and racist stereotype.
However, if the filmmaker instead portrays the new immigrant with perfect English
and a slice of lasagna for lunch, it is still considered offensive and racist
because the filmmaker tried so hard to defy the stereotypes that he made it
seem like the Asian culture is inferior. All in all, there is no way to win
with stereotypes, but there is also no way to avoid it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)